Free agronomy on every program · John Deere Financial & AgQuest financing available
All research

Wheat · 2021-2022 · Replicated field trial

Winter Wheat Trial Report

Winter wheat on the full AgriTec soil nutrition program yielded 98.8 bu/ac against 78.6 bu/ac for the untreated check, a +20.2 bu difference at P = .0001.

Agricenter International, Memphis TN

Agricenter International, Memphis TN · Download PDF ↓

Preparing your document…

Top program

98.8

bu/ac · Full AgriTec program

Untreated check

78.6

bu/ac

Difference

+20.2

bu/ac over the untreated check

Significance

P = 0.0001

Treatment F-test

Result by treatment

Wheat · 2021-2022

Untreated check No soil nutrition applied
78.6 c
Full AgriTec program Pro-Cal 5 gal · 3-18-18 7 gal · Form-14 0.5 gal · Nitro-Maxx+ 3 gal · Aerate 14 fl oz
98.8 a +20.2
3-18-18 + Pro-Cal 3-18-18 7 gal · Pro-Cal 5 gal
93 b +14.4
Nitro-Maxx+ + Pro-Cal Nitro-Maxx+ 3 gal · Pro-Cal 5 gal
88.6 b +10
Pro-Cal + Form-14 Pro-Cal 5 gal · Form-14 0.5 gal
88.1 b +9.5
Pro-Cal Pro-Cal 5 gal/ac
88.1 b +9.5
bu/ac LSD (P = .05) = 5.49 bu/ac Bars with different letters differ significantly (LSD, P = .05). Treatments 2 through 5 all share the letter b, so those four partial programs do not differ from one another.

How the trial was run

Site
Agricenter International research farm, Memphis TN · plots 6 × 30 ft
Layout
Randomized complete block
Treatments × reps
6 × 4 = 24 plots
Planted
Drilled October 25, 2021 · 85 lb/ac · 7.5 in rows · 0.75 in deep
Harvested
June 21, 2022 · Almaco plot combine · 5 × 30 ft strips
Soil
Silt loam · pH 5.4 · CEC 4.3 meq/100g · 1.8% OM · good drainage
Study director
Dr. K. Bruce Kirksey

Statistics

Treatment P(F)
0.0001
LSD (P = .05)
5.49 bu/ac
CV
4.1%
Grand mean
89.23 bu/ac

The breakdown

What happened, measurement by measurement.

Every chart below is transcribed from the report you can open above. Green means the AgriTec program won the measure outright; grey means it came in statistically even, which on a quality measure is the result you want — the yield came without a give-back.

Plot weight

The heaviest plots in the trial were the full AgriTec program.

Beats control
Untreated check
16.78 c
Full AgriTec program
21.1 a
lb P(F) = .0001 · LSD 1.17

Fall vigor · rated 11/17/2021

Treated wheat went into winter visibly stronger.

Beats control
Untreated check
3 b
Treated (low)
4 a
Treated (high)
4.3 a
1 to 5 scale P(F) = .0001 · LSD 0.31

Spring vigor · rated 3/1/2022

The fall advantage was still there at green-up.

Beats control
Untreated check
3 c
Treated (low)
3.5
Treated (high)
4
1 to 5 scale P(F) = .0032 · LSD 0.50

Everything else that was measured

Including the measurements that did not move. A trial that only reports what improved isn't a trial.

Fall vigor (1 to 5, rated 11/17/2021)

check 3.0 b · treated 4.0 to 4.3 a

P(F) = .0001 · LSD 0.31

Spring vigor (1 to 5, rated 3/1/2022)

check 3.0 c · treated 3.5 to 4.0

P(F) = .0032 · LSD 0.50

Plot weight

16.78 c to 21.10 a lb

P(F) = .0001 · LSD 1.17

Test weight

58.3 d to 60.2 a lb/bu

P(F) = .0025 · LSD 0.91 · the one measure with a quality trade-off

Full program vs untreated check

+20.2 bu/ac

A 26% yield increase

What the report says

  • Yields standardized to 11% grain moisture, mean of four replicated plots.
  • The full program beat the next-best treatment by 5.8 bushels, above the LSD.
  • One pass only: all products soil-applied pre-emergence on 11/4/2021 in 20 gal/ac water. No in-season foliar applications were part of this protocol.
  • Two weeks after application every treated plot rated a full point ahead of the check on fall vigor, and treated plots held the advantage through spring green-up.
  • AgriTec supplied the products and the protocol; Agricenter did the planting, spraying, rating and harvest.

Trial notes & scope

  • One replicated small-plot trial in one season. Responses will vary with soil, weather and management.
  • Treatments 2 through 5 all share the letter b. Those four partial programs (88.1, 88.1, 88.6, 93.0 bu/ac) do not differ significantly from one another.
  • The site was an acid, low-CEC soil (pH 5.4, CEC 4.3, OM 1.8%), conditions favourable to a calcium response.
  • Test weight differed significantly (P = .0025): 3-18-18 + Pro-Cal fell to 58.3 lb/bu against 60.0 for the check, though the full program matched the check.
  • The report prints the yield LSD as 5.5 bu/ac in the chart and 5.49 in the means table.

The full report

Read every page.

Download PDF

Preparing your document…

Want to know what your soil would do?

A trial is a starting point, not a promise. Send us your soil test and we'll build the program around your numbers.

Help us tailor the site

What do you grow?

1 / 2

Pick any that apply. The more we know, the better the recommendations.

Pick at least one